Working memory is the system that allows us to hold information in the mind and manipulate it over a short period of time. For more information view the TechLauncher website. I went to Le Brévent and enjoyed a really nice sunburn view of Mont Blanc. Frontiers of Legal Theory. He states as a goal of such legal theory to create “tools essential for understanding and improving the system” and he considers as the most valuable contributions in such effort insights created by other social sciences, like economics, sociology, psychology, or history. Therefore, legal theory is in the book constantly valuated by the reference to legal practice. 168) However, in order to understand more deeply the author’s philosophy, we need to consider the third part of the book (occupied with the relation between law and psychology), which is much more revealing in this aspect. This book should be read by all those who think about the possible reforms of the law and by all those who would like to think more thoroughly about what the law is and what the author thinks it should be. The main aim of the book seems to be in explaining the working of the law in terms of the philosophy of pragmatism as developed by the American thinkers of the early twentieth century. Author achieves this aim by both dispelling misconceptions about most commonly accepted sources of legal rules (author deals in this book expressly with the role of economical thinking, history, and psychology), and by explaining the role of the pragmatism in the legal (mainly judicial) discretion.1 The role of pragmatism is crucial in understanding author’s position, ادامه مطلب which is very clearly influenced by the author’s experience as the circuit court justice. For example, in the second part of the book author defends the cost-benefit analysis against its opponents. 263) from the pragmatic position about advantages of the concept of “rational utility maximizer” concept of human behavior in similar fashion as in the previous part about usefulness of the cost-benefit analysis. The author clearly admits, that this type of analysis should be strictly limited in its use for the positive conclusions, and states that the most opponents are mistaken when using the cost-benefit analysis for non-measurable and normative purposes. If you loved this article so you would like to collect more info regarding برای دیدن ادامه مطلب اینجا را کلیک کنید kindly visit our own web site.